Donahue Scholar talks race Reply

Kristina KaufmannPhoto Edtior

Ken Hardy, a distinguished Donahue Scholar, speaks to the Lasell campus about race. Photo by Kristina Kaufmann

 

Ken Hardy, a distinguished Donahue Scholar, spoke to students and faculty in de­Witt Hall on October 2.

His speech encouraged students to be more aware of race and talk about it freely without feeling uncomfortable.

“Race is one of the most difficult things to talk about, it has us walking on egg shells,” said Hardy.

Hardy is an international author, professor at Drexel University in Philadelphia and director of the Elkenberg Institute for Relationships in New York City. He spoke about his opinions and concepts to help people become more comfort­able about race. Hardy said that we need skill and will to be able to talk about race; some of us have will, but not skill.

He encouraged the audience to learn how to have the skills to navigate conversations about race, but to first think about where they lie per­sonally with race. Hardy gave his thoughts on how being racially different from others effects how much a person signifies with race, touch­ing upon this by sharing how he thought many people view race.

“If I am not racist, then racism doesn’t ex­ist,” said Hardy, who pointed out that this is not the way to think of race.

During Hardy’s speech, he turned the microphone over to the students and faculty sitting in the audience to engage them in a discussion that presented many different opinions. From those questions stemmed dis­cussion about children and race, affirmative action and interracial couples.

“Affirmative action is a very touchy subject. Although students have opinions, they might feel uncomfortable discussing race. [Hardy’s] mis­sion is to get people talking,” said Linda Bucci, Chair of the Justice Studies Department.

During the interactive discussion, there were mixed feelings from the audience. Some audience members gave personal experiences about how they thought racism was fading, while others referred to research to argue oth­erwise. These mixed feelings were also present in the students’ and teachers’ final thoughts about Hardy’s speech.

“The discussion was intriguing, however, I thought the introduction could have grasped more of the audience’s attention. I enjoyed hearing many different view points, but I feel the purpose of the speech was lost,” said soph­omore Mary Fontaine.

“It was refreshing to have a speaker devote 40 minutes to audience participation and I hope that this talk will stimulate further discussion on race,” said Professor Tessa leRoux, Director of the Donahue Institute.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s